Unilateral War Waged in Libya

So we invaded Libya, yet another muslim nation in need of a higher power to tell it how to behave. (Sooner or later muslims have to to learn that it's time to step out of the stone age and leave their inherent savagery behind, but that's a whole different blog entry...).

Another sovereign nation invaded. And with only two other allies participating in this illegal invasion, it has to qualify as a Unilateral action. That is, it does if we go by the liberal standards outlined during the start of the Iraq war (Hey, BTW, why hasn't President Savior ended that one yet? ...). And we have not a peep from the vociferous anti-war left.  I don't smell any stink being raised by 'Code Pink' (well, no more than usual...).

I don't see any talk of Human Shields going to the swift aid of the inevitable civilian casualties.  Why not? Are Libyan civilians not as chic as Iraqi civilians?

I don't see any dirty dreadlock chicks or any palid, horn-rimmed frame sporting liberal 'males' marching on DC chanting cute rhymes and hoisting misspelled signs.

No 'War is never the Answer' or "If War is the Answer it Must  Have Been a Dumb Question' or other similar bumpersticker platitudes plastered all over the back of Prii (that's the plural of Prius) and Volkswagens.

I guess what was forbidden and morally wrong for George W. Bush is now by some twist of logic just AOK for the Muslim-In-Chief?

Gee, it's...it's...it's almost as if you liberals are hypocrites that don't hold yourselves to your own loudly voiced standards.

Imagine that, liberals not really meaning what they say.